Waterways Council praises Olmsted funding
October 17, 2013 | 11:04 AM
The Waterways Council, Inc., a group that advocates for modernization and maintenance of ports and inland waterways, today praised congressional passage of a provision authorizing an increase in the amount of money that can be spent on the Olmsted locks and dams project in Kentucky and Illinois.
The provision was included in the continuing resolution that Congress passed and President Barack Obama passed late Wednesday to fund the federal government through January 15.
Conservative activists today called the provision a “Kentucky kickback” to benefit Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., but Sens. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., and Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., the chairwoman and ranking member of the Senate Appropriations and Water Development Subcommittee, have defended it as necessary to the nation's transportation system.
In a news release, the Waterways Council said:
“The passage of last night’s continuing resolution to fund the federal government and raise the debt ceiling contained a provision to raise the 902(b) cap on the amount that can be spent on the Olmsted Project in Illinois to $2.9 billion from the current $1.56 billion. The measure does not appropriate funds, but allows work on the critically important project to continue.
“The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers informed the Inland Waterways Users Board in August that the Olmsted project would be shuttered in November 2013 and would displace 400 workers if Congress did not act the raise the cap.
“The Senate-passed Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) bill, the House Water Resources Reform Development Act (WRRDA) bill, and the FY 2014 Energy & Water Appropriations bill all contain provisions to raise the 902(b) cap but will not become law before the project would have shut down in November.
“If Olmsted were to have shut down, according to the Corps, it would have cost $40 million to restart the project, and of course, needlessly delay its delivery,” the Waterways Council said.
“To be clear, no money has been expended in this action by Congress. It simply raises the ceiling on the cost of project that was set in 1986 to allow work to continue in 2013 and beyond,” said Michael Toohey, president and CEO of the Waterways Council.
“This important project in Illinois has a 7.4-to-1 benefit-cost ratio as determined by the Corps of Engineers’ Chief’s Report approved by Congress, and is estimated to return more than $410 million annually in transportation cost savings and benefits when it is completed,” he continued.
The provision was included in the continuing resolution that Congress passed and President Barack Obama passed late Wednesday to fund the federal government through January 15.
Conservative activists today called the provision a “Kentucky kickback” to benefit Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., but Sens. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., and Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., the chairwoman and ranking member of the Senate Appropriations and Water Development Subcommittee, have defended it as necessary to the nation's transportation system.
In a news release, the Waterways Council said:
“The passage of last night’s continuing resolution to fund the federal government and raise the debt ceiling contained a provision to raise the 902(b) cap on the amount that can be spent on the Olmsted Project in Illinois to $2.9 billion from the current $1.56 billion. The measure does not appropriate funds, but allows work on the critically important project to continue.
“The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers informed the Inland Waterways Users Board in August that the Olmsted project would be shuttered in November 2013 and would displace 400 workers if Congress did not act the raise the cap.
“The Senate-passed Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) bill, the House Water Resources Reform Development Act (WRRDA) bill, and the FY 2014 Energy & Water Appropriations bill all contain provisions to raise the 902(b) cap but will not become law before the project would have shut down in November.
“If Olmsted were to have shut down, according to the Corps, it would have cost $40 million to restart the project, and of course, needlessly delay its delivery,” the Waterways Council said.
“To be clear, no money has been expended in this action by Congress. It simply raises the ceiling on the cost of project that was set in 1986 to allow work to continue in 2013 and beyond,” said Michael Toohey, president and CEO of the Waterways Council.
“This important project in Illinois has a 7.4-to-1 benefit-cost ratio as determined by the Corps of Engineers’ Chief’s Report approved by Congress, and is estimated to return more than $410 million annually in transportation cost savings and benefits when it is completed,” he continued.
