Flake and Stabenow engage in direct payment colloquy
August 01, 2013 | 05:57 PM
Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., got reassurances from Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., that she would oppose any continuation of the direct payments program in the farm bill conference, but he declined to commit himself to vote for the farm bill, saying only that he would oppose an extension that includes direct payments.
In a scheduled colloquy on the Senate floor before the Senate adjourned until September, Flake noted that the Senate-passed farm bill eliminated the $4.9 billion in direct payments that crop farmers get annually whether prices are high or low, but that the House-passed bill includes “a carve out” that continues direct payments to cotton farmers at a rate of 70 percent in 2014 and 60 percent in 2015.
Flake noted that the Congressional Budget Office said the payments to cotton farmers would cost $823 million and said he was seeking Stabenow’s commitment to protect the Senate’s elimination of the program in conference.
“I strongly agree we should not be spending taxpayer dollars to fund these direct payment subsidies, and I will do everything I can to make sure the conference committee adopts the Senate version of this issue,” Stabenow said.
But she added that if the farm bill isn’t signed into law by September 30, direct payments may continue, “so I hope we can count on your support to make sure we can pass the farm bill on time and eliminate direct payments.”
Flake replied that “the Senate farm bill leaves much to be desired.”
“In fact, to gain my support, the farm bill will need to undergo dramatic changes to remove market-distorting price supports and limit the scope of the federal government in U.S. agriculture,” he said.
Passing an extension that includes direct payments, Flake added, “would be a costly regression in light of the Senate’s bipartisan effort to eliminate this multibillion-dollar subsidy.”
“The chairwoman has my commitment to do everything I can to ensure that any legislation that should come before the Senate containing an extension of direct payments will be met with my fierce opposition.”
In a scheduled colloquy on the Senate floor before the Senate adjourned until September, Flake noted that the Senate-passed farm bill eliminated the $4.9 billion in direct payments that crop farmers get annually whether prices are high or low, but that the House-passed bill includes “a carve out” that continues direct payments to cotton farmers at a rate of 70 percent in 2014 and 60 percent in 2015.
Flake noted that the Congressional Budget Office said the payments to cotton farmers would cost $823 million and said he was seeking Stabenow’s commitment to protect the Senate’s elimination of the program in conference.
“I strongly agree we should not be spending taxpayer dollars to fund these direct payment subsidies, and I will do everything I can to make sure the conference committee adopts the Senate version of this issue,” Stabenow said.
But she added that if the farm bill isn’t signed into law by September 30, direct payments may continue, “so I hope we can count on your support to make sure we can pass the farm bill on time and eliminate direct payments.”
Flake replied that “the Senate farm bill leaves much to be desired.”
“In fact, to gain my support, the farm bill will need to undergo dramatic changes to remove market-distorting price supports and limit the scope of the federal government in U.S. agriculture,” he said.
Passing an extension that includes direct payments, Flake added, “would be a costly regression in light of the Senate’s bipartisan effort to eliminate this multibillion-dollar subsidy.”
“The chairwoman has my commitment to do everything I can to ensure that any legislation that should come before the Senate containing an extension of direct payments will be met with my fierce opposition.”
